Ragtime - Revision history

Edb: Expand the comprehensive music catalogue with reviewed distinct performances; prioritize recent discovery, retain good older music and preserve existing prose, recordings and fields.

2026-10-22T11:35:31Z

Expand the comprehensive music catalogue with reviewed distinct performances; prioritize recent discovery, retain good older music and preserve existing prose, recordings and fields.

Show changes

Edb: Add canonical MuGlobe favorite, current-hit and authentic fields to all recording links; preserve existing music and article content

2026-10-22T02:33:34Z

Add canonical MuGlobe favorite, current-hit and authentic fields to all recording links; preserve existing music and article content

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:33, 22 October 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:
	{\| class="wikitable muglobe-performances"		{\| class="wikitable muglobe-performances"
	\|+ MuGlobe representative performances		\|+ MuGlobe representative performances
	! Artist !! Performance / song / title !! Embedded player URL !! Notes		! Artist !! Performance / song / title !! Embedded player URL !! Notes !! Repertoire kind !! Repertoire date !! Recording date !! Format !! Opening !! Places !! Fit !! Evidence !! Review note !! MuGlobe favorite !! Current hit !! Authentic
	\|-		\|-
	\| Joshua Rifkin \|\| Maple Leaf Rag — Scott Joplin \|\| https://www.youtube.com/embed/D7VWeySzvyI \|\| The pianist performs Joplin’s composition in a remastered recording. Syncopated melody against the regular accompaniment gives a direct piano-ragtime example; Joplin is the composer, not the performer in this release.<ref name="performance-ragtime-1">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7VWeySzvyI Joshua Rifkin — Maple Leaf Rag — Scott Joplin]. YouTube recording; metadata checked 2026-10-18. Context: [https://www.nonesuch.com/albums/scott-joplin-piano-rags supporting source].</ref>		\| Joshua Rifkin \|\| Maple Leaf Rag — Scott Joplin \|\| https://www.youtube.com/embed/D7VWeySzvyI \|\| The pianist performs Joplin’s composition in a remastered recording. Syncopated melody against the regular accompaniment gives a direct piano-ragtime example; Joplin is the composer, not the performer in this release.<ref name="performance-ragtime-1">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7VWeySzvyI Joshua Rifkin — Maple Leaf Rag — Scott Joplin]. YouTube recording; metadata checked 2026-10-18. Context: [https://www.nonesuch.com/albums/scott-joplin-piano-rags supporting source].</ref> \|\| unknown \|\| unknown \|\| unknown \|\| unknown \|\| unknown \|\| unknown \|\| pending \|\| [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7VWeySzvyI Existing recording] \|\| Legacy accepted recording retained during curation-field migration; no new age or geographic claims. \|\| <muglobe-flag video="D7VWeySzvyI" field="muglobeFavorite" /> \|\| <muglobe-flag video="D7VWeySzvyI" field="currentHit" /> \|\| <muglobe-flag video="D7VWeySzvyI" field="authentic" />
	\|-		\|-
	\| Eubie Blake \|\| Charleston Rag \|\| https://www.youtube.com/embed/uKbo3VovRtw \|\| Columbia/Legacy’s official audio presents Blake playing his own rag. The composer-performer example offers a useful contrast to Joshua Rifkin’s reading of Joplin, showing different approaches within piano ragtime.<ref name="performance-ragtime-2">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKbo3VovRtw Eubie Blake — Charleston Rag]. YouTube recording; metadata checked 2026-10-18.</ref>		\| Eubie Blake \|\| Charleston Rag \|\| https://www.youtube.com/embed/uKbo3VovRtw \|\| Columbia/Legacy’s official audio presents Blake playing his own rag. The composer-performer example offers a useful contrast to Joshua Rifkin’s reading of Joplin, showing different approaches within piano ragtime.<ref name="performance-ragtime-2">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKbo3VovRtw Eubie Blake — Charleston Rag]. YouTube recording; metadata checked 2026-10-18.</ref> \|\| unknown \|\| unknown \|\| unknown \|\| unknown \|\| unknown \|\| unknown \|\| pending \|\| [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKbo3VovRtw Existing recording] \|\| Legacy accepted recording retained during curation-field migration; no new age or geographic claims. \|\| <muglobe-flag video="uKbo3VovRtw" field="muglobeFavorite" /> \|\| <muglobe-flag video="uKbo3VovRtw" field="currentHit" /> \|\| <muglobe-flag video="uKbo3VovRtw" field="authentic" />
	\|}		\|}

Edb: Add sourced representative performance playlist; preserve article prose and hotspot mushrooms

2026-10-18T18:13:30Z

Add sourced representative performance playlist; preserve article prose and hotspot mushrooms

muglobe-article
← Older revision		Revision as of 18:13, 18 October 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:
	== Artists ==		== Artists ==
	Scott Joplin provides an essential gateway through both familiar pieces and less frequently heard work. James Scott, Joseph Lamb, Tom Turpin, Eubie Blake and Artie Matthews offer contrasting compositional and performance histories. Later interpreters and composers reveal different views of the repertoire rather than one settled restoration. Listen to more than one performance of the same piece and follow the shape of each strain. Composer credits matter, but so do performers’ choices of tempo, articulation and balance. A dramatic recording may reveal different details from a restrained reading of the score.		Scott Joplin provides an essential gateway through both familiar pieces and less frequently heard work. James Scott, Joseph Lamb, Tom Turpin, Eubie Blake and Artie Matthews offer contrasting compositional and performance histories. Later interpreters and composers reveal different views of the repertoire rather than one settled restoration. Listen to more than one performance of the same piece and follow the shape of each strain. Composer credits matter, but so do performers’ choices of tempo, articulation and balance. A dramatic recording may reveal different details from a restrained reading of the score.

			== Representative performances ==
			These recordings offer listening examples of the genre. Notes identify the performance setting and any adaptation or mixed repertoire.

			{\| class="wikitable muglobe-performances"
			\|+ MuGlobe representative performances
			! Artist !! Performance / song / title !! Embedded player URL !! Notes
			\|-
			\| Joshua Rifkin \|\| Maple Leaf Rag — Scott Joplin \|\| https://www.youtube.com/embed/D7VWeySzvyI \|\| The pianist performs Joplin’s composition in a remastered recording. Syncopated melody against the regular accompaniment gives a direct piano-ragtime example; Joplin is the composer, not the performer in this release.<ref name="performance-ragtime-1">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7VWeySzvyI Joshua Rifkin — Maple Leaf Rag — Scott Joplin]. YouTube recording; metadata checked 2026-10-18. Context: [https://www.nonesuch.com/albums/scott-joplin-piano-rags supporting source].</ref>
			\|-
			\| Eubie Blake \|\| Charleston Rag \|\| https://www.youtube.com/embed/uKbo3VovRtw \|\| Columbia/Legacy’s official audio presents Blake playing his own rag. The composer-performer example offers a useful contrast to Joshua Rifkin’s reading of Joplin, showing different approaches within piano ragtime.<ref name="performance-ragtime-2">[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKbo3VovRtw Eubie Blake — Charleston Rag]. YouTube recording; metadata checked 2026-10-18.</ref>
			\|}

	== Related genres ==		== Related genres ==
Line 2:		Line 2:
	"category": "genre",		"category": "genre",
	"templatePageId": 17,		"templatePageId": 17,
	"templateRevisionId": 86,		"templateRevisionId": 1065,
	"templateVersion": 8		"templateVersion": 9
	}		}

Edb: Create researched genre article and inferred regional musical landscapes; Ed’s approved authoring method

2026-10-18T02:08:14Z

Create researched genre article and inferred regional musical landscapes; Ed’s approved authoring method

New page

== Summary ==
Ragtime is a syncopated musical field associated especially with composed piano pieces, but historically it also encompassed ways of playing, songs and ensemble repertories. A steady underlying pulse interacts with a melody that shifts accents across it, creating rhythmic lift and tension. The familiar solo piano rag is therefore a central form rather than the entire story. African American creativity supplied the music’s foundation, while publishing, performance and an unequal commercial culture spread and transformed it. Its carefully organised compositions invite interpretation, not merely mechanical execution. <ref name="new-ragtime-loc">[https://www.loc.gov/collections/songs-of-america/articles-and-essays/musical-styles/popular-songs-of-the-day/ragtime/ Ragtime — Library of Congress, Songs of America].</ref>

== Contemporary and trending ==
Its original turn-of-the-twentieth-century popular wave is historical, but pianists, composers, festivals, teachers and enthusiasts sustain an active practice. Modern performers study published scores, historical evidence and different approaches to timing and articulation. New rags are also composed. The Scott Joplin International Ragtime Foundation’s mentoring and community work demonstrate ongoing transmission rather than passive admiration of a few famous tunes. Revival listening, specialist performance and influence on later music are distinct dimensions of contemporary life. None requires ragtime to remain a current mass-market dance fashion. <ref name="new-ragtime-foundation">[https://www.scottjoplin.org/ Scott Joplin International Ragtime Foundation].</ref>

== History ==
Ragtime emerged from nineteenth-century African American musical practices, travelling performers, social dancing and the growing piano and sheet-music worlds. Missouri and the surrounding Midwest became a particularly dense compositional and publishing landscape. Scott Joplin, Tom Turpin, James Scott and others developed substantial bodies of work. The broader commercial ragtime craze also intersected with racist theatrical and song conventions, which should be distinguished from the dignity and artistic ambition of composers’ projects. Jazz later developed overlapping rhythmic resources, but did not simply render ragtime obsolete. Twentieth-century revivals renewed interest in scores and overlooked creators.

== Musical characteristics ==
Classic piano rags often unfold through several contrasting strains, with a recurring bass-and-chord foundation beneath syncopated melodic writing. Phrase shape, inner voices, register and harmonic contrast create larger architecture. The player’s touch and pacing can reveal tenderness, humour or tension without turning every piece into a speed contest. Historical ragging could also mean applying syncopated treatment to other tunes, and bands or banjo players offered different textures. Not all ragtime should be swung like later jazz. Performance choices need attention to the particular composition and tradition rather than one universal rule.

== Geography and communities ==
Missouri, neighbouring midwestern and upper-South networks form the principal historical and continuing landscape. Sedalia and StLouis are parts of that broader world, not isolated islands of interest. Northeastern and Californian specialist communities add meaningful adopted fields, while Britain and continental Europe have durable performance and revival connections. The map gives these lighter intensity rather than implying today’s population listens as it did during the original craze. Broad fields represent festivals, teaching, playing and specialist audiences; they are not a catalogue of composers’ birthplaces or surviving historic pianos.

== Artists ==
Scott Joplin provides an essential gateway through both familiar pieces and less frequently heard work. James Scott, Joseph Lamb, Tom Turpin, Eubie Blake and Artie Matthews offer contrasting compositional and performance histories. Later interpreters and composers reveal different views of the repertoire rather than one settled restoration. Listen to more than one performance of the same piece and follow the shape of each strain. Composer credits matter, but so do performers’ choices of tempo, articulation and balance. A dramatic recording may reveal different details from a restrained reading of the score.

== Related genres ==
Early jazz shares syncopation and repertory relationships but gives improvisation and ensemble interaction different roles. Stride piano developed related left-hand resources into another expansive language. Cakewalks, ragtime songs and novelty piano overlap historically without being exact synonyms for classic piano rag. A tune with ragtime in its title is not automatically a formal rag. Silent-film accompaniment and later screen use helped circulate familiar sounds but should not define the whole practice. Keeping those distinctions allows listeners to move beyond a comic background-music stereotype toward the music’s compositional range.

=== References and further reading ===
<references />

* [https://folkways-media.si.edu/docs/folkways/artwork/SFW40820.pdf Jazz: The Smithsonian Anthology]

== Hotspot mushrooms ==
Missouri and connected Midwest/upper-South histories form a shared landscape, with meaningful lighter adopted American and European specialist worlds. Current revival attachment is distinguished from the original mass-market craze.

These fields are editorial illustrations of musical affinity and cultural reach, not listener statistics. Radius marks the zero edge of the fade; overlapping fields of this genre combine by maximum.

{| class="wikitable muglobe-hotspots"
|+ MuGlobe hotspot mushrooms
! ID !! Location !! Latitude !! Longitude !! Radius (km) !! Strength !! Notes

|-
| ragtime-midwest || Missouri–Midwest ragtime landscape || 38.5 || -92.5 || 1050 || 1 || Connected composition, historical culture, festivals and continuing specialist practice.

|-
| ragtime-upper-south || Upper-South and lower-midwestern ragtime continuations || 35.5 || -89 || 900 || 0.65 || Historical travelling and performance connections with continuing repertoire attachment.

|-
| ragtime-northeast || Northeastern US ragtime performance and study circuits || 40.5 || -74 || 850 || 0.57 || Durable adopted specialist and educational networks.

|-
| ragtime-california || California ragtime revival communities || 37 || -120 || 850 || 0.63 || Longstanding adopted performance, festival and piano culture.

|-
| ragtime-europe || British and European ragtime specialist worlds || 50 || 3 || 1450 || 0.49 || Durable revival, historical performance and composition networks.

|}